Cricket news

Slightly arbitrarily, we've decreed that a chasing side should get the bonus point if they win with 15% of their Duckworth-Lewis resource remaining. For a 50-over match, the targets depend on the number of wickets lost, as follows:

0 wickets - 26 balls
1 wicket  - 26 balls
2 wickets - 27 balls
3 wickets - 27 balls
4 wickets - 28 balls
5 wickets - 29 balls
6 wickets - 31 balls
7 wickets - 41 balls
8 wickets - cannot be done
9 wickets - cannot be done

These figures will change if there's a D-L adjusted target, or the match is of fewer than 50 overs.

We've been thinking again about the most ludicrously complex method of running a world cup, yet getting it complete in less time than it takes an elephant to have a baby. The idea of organising the entire tournament as a Double San Marino football playoff appeals.

Tier 4 (qualifiers from ICC) play off against Tier 3 (Ken, Zim, Ireland, Ban as worst ranked side). Winners play against Tier 2 (Ind, Pak, Eng, WI). Winners then play against tier 1, which produces four undefeated teams to reduce to one in the normal manner.

Losers of the first two rounds of matches play off, winners meet the losers from the third round, winners then reduce from four to 2 to meet the defeated round-of-4 sides. Another match provides a single winner to play against the loser of the mini-final. Winner there meets the winner of the mini-final to determine the winner. At any stage, a second defeat sends a side home.

The contest would thus reduce to 30 matches, all of them important in some way, and could certainly be completed in a month or so. The downside, of course, is that the only people able to understand it would be the organisers. And Peter Snow.

10 May, Dhaka. India wins by 5 wickets with 6 balls remaining (DL: 3.6%). Bangladesh 250/7 (47/47 ov); India 251/5 (46/47 ov). India 5, Bangladesh 1.

12 May, Dhaka. India won by 46 runs (19%). India 284/8 (49/49 ov); Bangladesh 238/9 (49/49 ov). India 5, Bangladesh 1.

15 May, Chittagong. Match abandoned without a ball bowled.

AUS  1285   119.7
SL   1151   113.4
NZ   1057   121.5
SA    989   123.9
IND   943   157.2
ENG   939   128.2
PAK   921   179.9
WI    910   121.4
BAN   860   122.9

linkpage

Pakistan beat Sri Lanka

A three-match series on the neutral territory of Abu Dhabi, between a side that did very well at the recent World Cup and a side that didn't last after the clocks went forward.

The rest clearly did Pakistan some good, as they win the series in two matches. They rise from sixth to fourth in the table:

AUS  1285   119.7
SL   1121   115.2
NZ   1057   121.5
PAK   996   172.2
SA    989   123.9
IND   943   157.2
ENG   939   128.2
WI    910   121.4
BAN   860   122.9

Next: India -v- South Africa at Belfast, 26 June - 1 July
England -v- West Indies, 1 - 7 July
England -v- India, 21 August - 8 September

linkpage

A Testing time

Working out a formula to bring Test matches within the scope of Glickoblog-cricket is difficult. First, we've got to work out how much more important a Test success is against a one-day win. Our naive estimate is that it's roughly, but not quite, twice as important. We propose to make it 1.8 times as rewarding.

The basic concept is similar to the existing one-day formula: a tied match splits 9:9, an innings victory scoops all 18 points.

Victory by wickets

Where victories are taken by the side batting last, they're given by the number of wickets remaining. Award points as follows:

Win by 10 wickets - 17 points
9 or 8 wickets - 16 points
7w - 15p
6w - 14p
5w - 13p
4w or 3w - 12p
2w or 1w - 11p

Victory by runs

Where victories are made by the side bowling last, the margin is runs. Calculate the margin of victory as a percentage of the total score of the losing side, as follows:

>50% - 17p
35-50% - 16p
20-35% - 15p
15-20% - 14p
10-15% - 13p
5-10% - 12p
<=5% - 11p

In the rare event that the side batting last scores fewer runs in their two innings than the other side made in their first innings, treat as an Innings Victory. For instance, India 295 and 150; Bangladesh 100 and 100 is officially a win for India by 245 runs; we treat it as an innings.

Draws

So far, so simple. Drawn matches present a problem - how do we come up with a simple method of adjudicating draws? We need to scale up the incomplete innings to completion, factor in any unstarted innings, and then adjudicate upon the result.

Now, we're not aware of any research that says on average, when a side loses its second wicket, it will go on to increase its score by %%so much%%. In the absence of such research, we reach for the Duckworth-Lewis tables, read across the very top line - resource remaining with all overs left - double it, and add on the runs scored already:

Wickets lost - scale factor
0 - 300%
1 - 286.8%
2 - 270.2%
3 - 249.8%
4 - 225.5%
5 - 198.0%
6 - 169.8%
7 - 144.0%
8 - 123.8%
9 - 109.4%

So, for instance, if the match ends with the final side on 100/6, we estimate that they will have increase their score to 169.8% of the current total, and finish on 170 all out.

That's fine for matches where the fourth innings begins; where it doesn't, we assume that the side batting last will have done so at the same rate-per-over as they did in their first innings, and will bat for the same number of overs as the presumptive duration of the third innings. For instance: Aus 400 and 100/6 (35 overs); NZ 300 (100 overs). We scale up the Australian second innings to 170, and award the New Zealand side (runs/overs)*opp_overs*scale = (300/100)*35*1.698 = 178.

(Sidebar) It has been observed that test match wickets are lost at the approximate rate of one every 15 overs, and that the run-rate per over decreases approximately linearly with the number of wickets lost. In a study of one-day cricket, and ignoring the term relating to balls remaining, Carter and Guthrie implicitly propose a run-per-ball rate of 0.85-0.1028w where w wickets have fallen. If implemented, and assuming that wickets are lost exactly every 90 balls, this gives flat rates as follows:

Wickets lost - Additional runs
0 - 355
1 - 279
2 - 212
3 - 154
4 - 105
5 - 65
6 - 35
7 - 14
8 - 3
9 - 0

This does not appear to tally with the evidence, particularly with three or four wickets lost. It is entirely possible that a better model can be produced.

Back with the main thread, where we have estimated total scores for the sides. Now work out the margin of victory (in runs), divided into the winner's score - we use the winner, rather than the loser, because we're less certain about the result than before, and want to introduce a larger margin of error. Award points as follows:

Margin - points
<=5% - 9
5-15% - 10
15-25% - 11
25-40% - 12
40-75% - 13
>75% - 14

Where the second innings is incomplete, but has lasted at least 50 overs, scale that up and adjudicate on a single-innings match, for a maximum of 13 points. Where the second innings is incomplete and has not lasted 50 overs, declare a No Result, and award no points.

A side securing a draw is guaranteed 4 points; generally, the leader will receive a couple of points fewer than they would have done if the match had concluded.

Some recent worked examples:

Bangladesh -v- India, 18-22 May: IND 387 and 100/6d, BAN 238 and 104/2. Match drawn.
Computed totals: IND 487, BAN 238+104*2.702 = 238+281 = 519.
Margin of victory: (519-487) = 32 runs, 6.2% of BAN score.
Result: Bangladesh 10, India 8

In this Test, just over two days were lost to rain and bad light. Bangladesh had been set a total of 250 to win in 20 overs, and clearly held the upper hand in the chase. Would they have reached it? It's difficult to say; we reckon they would have more likely won than not.

Bangladesh -v- India, 25-27 May: IND 610, BAN 118 and 253.
Margin of victory: Innings.
Result: India 18, Bangladesh 0.

Series result: India 26, Bangladesh 10.

For the purposes of Glickoblog expected results (0 a comprehensive ODI loss, 1 a comprehensive ODI win), work out the ratio of points per game, then work out the signed difference between the side's result and expectation, and multiply by 1.8. India's result in this series was 26/36 = 0.72; its expectation was 0.61, so the side is credited with a win by 0.22; this translates to 23 points. Bangladesh is punished for its poor performance in the second test, and loses 15 points.

England -v- West Indies, 17-21 May: ENG 553/5d and 284/8d; WI 437 and 89/0.
Computed totals: ENG 837, WI 437+89*3 = 437+267 = 704.
Margin of victory: (837-704) = 133 runs, 15.8% of ENG score.
Result: England 11, West Indies 7.

Slightly more than a day was lost to rain in this match, mostly on the final day; England had set the West Indies a near-impossible 401 to win.

25-28 May: ENG 570/7d; WI 146 and 141.
Margin of victory: Innings.
Result: England 18, West Indies 0.

7-11 June: ENG 370 and 313; WI 229 and 394.
Margin of victory: 60 runs, 9.6% of loser's score.
Result: England 12, West Indies 6.

15-19 June: WI 287 and 222; ENG 400 and 111/3.
Margin of victory: 7 wickets.
Result: England 15, West Indies 3.

Series result: England 56, West Indies 16.

The expected score was England 43, West Indies 29, so England advances by a good margin.

Adding in these two series results gives:

AUS  1285   119.7
BAN   845   117.4
ENG   977   129.3
IND   966   145.4
NZ   1057   121.5
PAK   996   172.2
SA    989   123.9
SL   1121   115.2
WI    875   124.1

For 20/20 matches, we propose awarding 2 points to the winner, 0 to the loser, 1 each for a tie, regardless of the margin; each match will (effectively) count as slightly less than half a full ODI.

Coming up before the end of August:
25 Jun - 15 Jul – Sri Lanka v Bangladesh (3 tests) Expected result: SL 39, Ban 9 - three crushing victories
26 Jun - 1 Jul – India v South Africa (3 ODI) Expected result: Ind 8½, SA 9½ - a slight edge to SA
28-29 Jun – England v West Indies (2 20-20) Expected result: Eng 2.5, WI 1.5.
1-7 Jul – England v West Indies (3 ODI) Expected result, approximate figure: Eng 12, WI 6 - almost exactly a 2-1 series win.
19 Jul - 13 Aug – England v India (3 Tests)
20-24 Jul – Sri Lanka v Bangladesh (3 ODI)
21 Aug - 8 Sep – England v India (7 ODI)

linkpage

Cric in the neck

A regular correspondent asks,

do you think there is validity in the miscibility of Test, ODI and XX20 results, even with appropriate weighting? Other ratings sytems maintain separate orderings for (at least two of) the different forms, and there is some degree of difference between the two.

The validity in the mixing of these systems is precisely the point of the experiment. It will take at least five years to complete, as we really need a complete round-robin rather than the mish-mash of loosely connected points we'll have by next February.

The point about maintaining separate lists has validity, and is reasonably easy to implement. Which brings us to:

Overall rankings

AUS  1285   119.7
SL   1121   115.2
NZ   1057   121.5
PAK   996   172.2
SA    989   123.9
ENG   977   129.3
IND   966   145.4
WI    875   124.1
BAN   845   117.4

Test matches

ENG  1045   180.9
IND  1029   180.9
AUS  1000   200
NZ   1000   200
PAK  1000   200
SA   1000   200
SL   1000   200
BAN   971   180.9
WI    955   180.9

One-day internationals

AUS  1285   119.7
SL   1121   115.2
NZ   1057   121.5
PAK   996   172.2
SA    989   123.9
IND   943   157.2
ENG   939   128.2
WI    910   121.4
BAN   860   122.9

Twenty-20 internationals

AUS   1000   200
BAN   1000   200
ENG   1000   200
IND   1000   200
NZ    1000   200
PAK   1000   200
SA    1000   200
SL    1000   200
WI    1000   200

Do we scent an England supporter wanting their team to be top of the rankings, at least for a few months?

Not convinced that treating second-innings scores of, e.g., 209 all out and 209/2 declared in the same way is correct. I suppose that the two are identical in terms of the objective of winning that one particular cricket match and teams who are planning to declare can really start to slog and not worry about how many wickets they lose, but it still seems like a poor reward for batting wicket economy.

The aim of a third-innings declaration is surely to force a positive result; a captain shouldn't declare when there is a reasonable chance his side might lose, and should leave his bowlers long enough to bowl the other side out. Checking back through Tests played since summer 2005, I've not been able to find any drawn test following a third-innings declaration that wouldn't score at least 8 points on this metric. I'll stick with this rule for the moment, but will keep an eye on it.

There is work to be done, particularly where the fourth innings is short - for instance, a side makes it to 7/0 on the fourth day, but the fifth is a wash-out - current rules credit them with just 21 runs. I need to work out a further rule assuming that the side batting fourth would be batting for a reasonable length - perhaps half the average innings length so far, multiplied by the run-rate from first and second innings combined, multiplied by the wicket-loss factor from the original Duckworth-Lewis tables.

linkpage

Sri Lanka and Bangladesh. There's only one winner.

Recent cricket results.

• 25 June, Test: Sri Lanka 577-6, Bangladesh 89 & 254. SL beat BAN by an innings and 234 runs.
  3 July, Test: Sri Lanka 451-6, Bangladesh 62 & 299. SL beat BAN by an innings and 90 runs.
  11 July, Test: Sri Lanka 500-4, Bangladesh 131 & 176. SL beat BAN by an innings and 193 runs.
  Series: Sri Lanka 54, Bangladesh 0.
• 26 June, ODI: India 242-8, South Africa 245-6. South Africa beat India by 4 wickets with 3 balls in hand.
  28 June, ODI: India 227-4, South Africa 226-6. India beat South Africa by 6 wickets with 5 balls in hand.
  1 July, ODI: India 152-4, South Africa 148-7. India beat South Africa by 6 wickets with 4 balls in hand. Match reduced to 32 overs (78.3% of total.)
  Series: India 11, South Africa 7.
• 28 June, 20/20: England 193-7, West Indies 208-8. WI win by 15 runs.
  29 June, 20/20: England 173-5, West Indies 169-7. Eng win by 5 wickets with 3 balls in hand.
  Series: England 2, WI 2.
• 1 July, ODI: England 225, WI 146. England beat West Indies by 79 runs.
  4 July, ODI: England 217, WI 278-5. West Indies beat England by 61 runs.
  7 July, ODIL England 196, WI 289-5. West Indies beat England by 93 runs.
  Series: WI 12, England 6.

The rankings

Overall

AUS   1285  119.7
SL    1147  121.5
NZ    1057  121.5
PAK   996   172.2
IND   981   139.1
SA    977   126.2
ENG   949   121.1
WI    900   117.5
BAN   881   123.3

Test

SL    1137   181.4
ENG   1045   180.9
IND   1029   180.9
AUS   1000   200
NZ    1000   200
PAK   1000   200
SA    1000   200
WI    955    180.9
BAN   856    168.4

One-day

AUS   1285  119.7
SL    1121  115.2
NZ    1057  121.5
PAK   996   172.2
SA    975   126.2
IND   963   148
WI    928   128.1
ENG   920   133.1
BAN   860   122.9

20/20

AUS   1000   200
BAN   1000   200
ENG   1000   177.8
IND   1000   200
NZ    1000   200
PAK   1000   200
SA    1000   200
SL    1000   200
WI    1000   177.8

England now goes on to meet India. England has benefitted from playing a weak West Indies side, while India's success has come from beating up Bangladesh. Four Tests and seven one-dayers in the battle of the playground bullies. The overall figures suggest India will shade the series by about 39-33. Sri Lanka and Bangladesh will bat out three one-day matches next week, we're predicting another big win for SL, 15½-2½

linkpage

Cricket news

For the past little while, we've been pondering how to scale up incomplete innings. We reckon that the fairest way to resolve short fourth innings is to take the maximum of the flat rate and scaled rate proposed in the original article. A side ending on 15/1 after four overs will increase by the flat rate to 294; an established innings of 400/7 will use the scaled rate, and progress to 574.

ODI series, Sri Lanka in Bangladesh

Final score: Sri Lanka 17½, Bangladesh ½.

Test series, India in England

Final score: India 35, England 19

New tables

OVERALL

AUS	1285	119.7
SL	1156	118.4
NZ	1057	121.5
PAK	996	172.2
IND	992	137.5
SA	977	126.2
ENG	935	119.9
WI	900	117.5
BAN	809	120.1

TEST

SL	1137	181.4
IND	1072	170.3
ENG	1002	170.3
AUS	1000	200
NZ	1000	200
PAK	1000	200
SA	1000	200
WI	955	180.9
BAN	856	168.4

ONE-DAY

AUS	1285	119.7
SL	1134	121.3
NZ	1057	121.5
PAK	996	172.2
SA	975	126.2
IND	963	148
WI	928	128.1
ENG	920	133.1
BAN	845	127.7

linkpage

Twenty-20, or 4-3

The seven-game one-day series between England and India finally reached a conclusion on Saturday. It had been running for almost three weeks, which strikes us as a bit long. Here are the classified results.

21 August, Southampton
England 288/2 (50 ov); India 184 (50 ov)
England won by 104 runs. 6-0.

24 Aug, Bristol.
India 329/7 (50 ov); England 320/8 (50 ov)
India won by 9 runs. 5-1.

27 Aug, Birmingham.
England 281/8 (50 ov); India 239 (48.1 ov)
England won by 42 runs. 5-1.

30 Aug, Manchester.
India 212 (49.4 ov); England 213/7 (48 ov)
England won by 3 wickets with 12 balls remaining. 5-1.

2 Sep, Leeds.
India 324/6 (50 ov); England 242/8 (39/39 ov)
India won by 38 runs (D/L method). 5-1

5 Sep, The Oval.
England 316/6 (50 ov); India 317/8 (49.4 ov)
India won by 2 wickets (with 2 balls remaining). 5-1.

8 Sep, Lord's - Sep 8, 2007
India 187 (47.3 ov); England 188/3 (36.2 ov)
England won by 7 wickets with 82 balls remaining. 6-0.

Final score: England 25, India 17.

There's also a 20-20 World Cup under way. We don't count the warm-up matches, as these were (at least nominally) friendly games. Quite how anything between Australia and New Zealand can be called friendly is beyond us. There was also one proper warm-up tournament, giving this classified result:

20/20 Quadrangular (also involving Kenya and Uganda)

2 Sep, Nairobi.
Pakistan 191/7 (20/20 ov); Bangladesh 161/7 (20/20 ov)
Pakistan won by 30 runs. 2-0.

Bangladesh finished second, but the surprise was that Uganda beat Kenya to finish third.

The tables

Overall

AUS   1285   119.7   5
SL    1156   118.4   2
NZ    1057   121.5   5
PAK   1015   170.4   0
SA     977   126.2   3
IND    976   132.9   0
ENG    948   118.9   0
WI     900   117.5   2
BAN    799   124.9   0

Test

SL    1137   181.4   2
IND   1072   170.3   1
ENG   1002   170.3   1
AUS   1000   200.0   3
NZ    1000   200.0   3
PAK   1000   200.0   3
SA    1000   200.0   3
WI     955   180.9   3
BAN    856   168.4   2

ODI

AUS   1285   119.7   5
SL    1134   121.3   2
NZ    1057   121.5   5
PAK    996   172.2   4
SA     975   126.2   3
IND    946   147.8   0
ENG    934   133.7   0
WI     928   128.1   2
BAN    845   127.7   2

20/20

PAK   1038   187.0   0
AUS   1000   200.0   3
ENG   1000   177.8   3
IND   1000   200.0   3
NZ    1000   200.0   3
SA    1000   200.0   3
SL    1000   200.0   3
WI    1000   177.8   3
BAN    962   187.0   0

linkpage

20-20 World Championships

Results from the first phase of the 20-20 Cup:

West Indies failed to qualify for the second phase. All three matches in their group are treated as happening simultaneously.

20-20 Standings

AUS   1038   185.8
SL    1038   187.0
PAK   1035   170.7
SA    1034   163.9
IND   1004   185.9
ENG    968   171.4
NZ     962   187.0
WI     962   153.6
BAN    962   152.9

Overall standings

AUS   1292   138.6
SL    1169   122.2
NZ    1041   135.8
PAK   1012   155.4
SA    1002   124.5
IND    983   126.0
ENG    943   116.1
WI     864   114.9
BAN    813   113.6

The second phase has begun already, and continues until Thursday.

linkpage

Cricket news

The remaining stages of the 20/20 World Cup have taken place.

Group A

New Zealand 190 (20/20 ov); India 180/9 (20/20 ov)
New Zealand won by 10 runs

South Africa 154/8 (20/20 ov); England 135/7 (20/20 ov)
South Africa won by 19 runs

New Zealand 164/9 (20/20 ov); England 159/8 (20/20 ov)
New Zealand won by 5 runs

New Zealand 153/8 (20/20 ov); South Africa 158/4 (19.1/20 ov)
South Africa won by 6 wickets (with 5 balls remaining)

India 218/4 (20/20 ov); England 200/6 (20/20 ov)
India won by 18 runs

India 153/5 (20/20 ov); South Africa 116/9 (20/20 ov)
India won by 37 runs

Group B

Bangladesh 123/8 (20/20 ov); Australia 124/1 (13.5/20 ov)
Australia won by 9 wickets (with 37 balls remaining)

Pakistan 189/6 (20/20 ov); Sri Lanka 156/9 (20/20 ov)
Pakistan won by 33 runs

Australia 164/7 (20/20 ov); Pakistan 165/4 (19.1/20 ov)
Pakistan won by 6 wickets (with 5 balls remaining)

Sri Lanka 147/5 (20/20 ov); Bangladesh 83 (15.5/20 ov)
Sri Lanka won by 64 runs

Sri Lanka 101 (19.3/20 ov); Australia 102/0 (10.2/20 ov)
Australia won by 10 wickets (with 58 balls remaining)

Bangladesh 140 (19.4/20 ov); Pakistan 141/6 (19/20 ov)
Pakistan won by 4 wickets (with 6 balls remaining)

Semi-finals

New Zealand 143/8 (20/20 ov); Pakistan 147/4 (18.5/20 ov)
Pakistan won by 6 wickets (with 7 balls remaining)

India 188/5 (20/20 ov); Australia 173/7 (20/20 ov)
India won by 15 runs

Final

India 157/5 (20/20 ov); Pakistan 152 (19.3/20 ov)
India won by 5 runs

India, therefore, crowned the champions, defeating Pakistan in a tense final. Australia and New Zealand share third place, South Africa was unfortunate enough to go out on net run-rate, Sri Lanka won a game, and the 2009 hosts England did no better than Bangladesh.

The 20-20 Standings

PAK   1100   125.5
IND   1086   124.1
AUS   1054   138.6
SL    1048   149.3
SA    1026   129.2
NZ     965   132.6
WI     962   153.6
BAN    941   131.7
ENG    939   133

What's unusual about this table? That's right, Australia isn't first! What's not unusual about this table? England and Bangladesh are bottom. Yep, just four and a quarter years since England invented 20/20 cricket, the country is amongst the worst in the world at it. Even by English standards, that's a fast decline.

Overall

AUS   1248   119.5
SL    1140   109.6
PAK   1064   116.9
IND   1052   101
NZ    1032   109
SA    1012   106.7
ENG    915   101.5
WI     864   114.9
BAN    792   106.7

Pakistan and India the major gainers here, advancing to third and fourth. Is this beginning to look like a reasonable ladder of cricket countries yet?

The winter fixture list

With the calendar turning to October, the fixture list begins to heat up. Coming up next month:

* India -v- Australia (7 x ODI, 1 x 20-20)
* Pakistan -v- South Africa (2 x Test, 5 x ODI)
* Sri Lanka -v- England (5 x ODI; 3 x Tests in Dec)

Later this winter:

* South Africa -v- New Zealand (2 x Test, 5 x ODI)
* Australia -v- Sri Lanka (2 x Test)
* India -v- Pakistan (3 x Test, 5 x ODI)
* Australia -v- New Zealand (3 x ODI)
* South Africa -v- West Indies (4 x Test, 5 x ODI)
* New Zealand -v- Bangladesh
* Australia -v- India (4 x Tests)
* New Zealand -v- England (3 x Test, 5 x ODI)
* Pakistan -v- Australia (3 x Test, 5 x ODI)
* Bangladesh -v- South Africa (2 x Test)
* Bangladesh -v- India (3 x ODI)
* India -v- South Africa (3 x Test)
* West Indies -v- Sri Lanka (3 x Test, 5 x ODI)
* West Indies -v- Australia (4 x Test, 5 x ODI)
* Aus / Ind / SL ODI tournament
* Ban / Ind / SA ODI tournament
* Asia Cup

linkpage

October's cricket news

Tests: South Africa won 1:0 in Pakistan

1st Test: South Africa won by 160 runs
South Africa 450 and 264/7d; Pakistan 291 and 263
Winning margin: 22.4% of loser's score.

SA 15-3 Pak

2nd Test: Match drawn
South Africa 357 and 305/4d; Pakistan 206 and 316/4
Computed scores: SA 662 Pak 918
Leading margin: 256, 27.9% of leader's score.

SA 6-12 Pak

Overall: SA beat Pakistan 21:15

One-day: Australia won 4:2 in India

1st ODI: No result
2nd ODI: Australia won by 84 runs (6-0)
3rd ODI: Australia won by 47 runs (6-0)
4th ODI: India won by 8 runs (1-5)
5th ODI: Australia won by 9 wickets (6-0)
6th ODI: Australia won by 18 runs (5-1)
7th ODI: India won by 2 wickets (1½-4½)

Overall: Australia beat India 25½-10½

20/20: India beat Australia

Australia 166/5 (20/20 ov); India 167/3 (18.1/20 ov)

Overall: India beat Australia 2:0

One-day: England won 3:2 in Sri Lanka

1st ODI: Sri Lanka won by 119 runs (0-6)
2nd ODI: England won by 65 runs (6-0)
3rd ODI: England won by 2 wickets (D/L) (5-1)
4th ODI: England won by 5 wickets / 19 balls (5-1)
5th ODI: Sri Lanka won by 107 runs (½-5½)

Overall: England beat Sri Lanka 16½-13½

One-day: South Africa won 3:2 in Pakistan

1st ODI: South Africa won by 45 runs (6-0)
2nd ODI: Pakistan won by 25 runs (1-5)
3rd ODI: Pakistan won by 6 wickets, 11 balls (1-5)
4th ODI: South Africa won by 7 wickets, 74 balls (6-0)
5th ODI: South Africa won by 14 runs (5-1)

Overall: South Africa beat Pakistan 19-11

Overall rankings

AUS  1221   114.9
SL   1118   111.4
IND  1072   100.8
SA   1038   103.4
PAK  1034   110.7
NZ   1032   109
ENG   934   104.4
WI    864   114.9
BAN   792   106.7

Australia lost points in spite of winning the ODI series; India moved further ahead with the 20/20. South Africa head Pakistan after winning in tests and one-dayers. England's win: a surprise.

Test rankings

SL   1137   181.4
SA   1026   189.2
IND  1072   170.3
ENG  1002   170.3
AUS  1000   200
NZ   1000   200
PAK   974   189.2
WI    955   180.9
BAN   856   168.4

South Africa and Pakistan open their accounts.

One-day rankings

AUS  1270   142.6
SL   1108   129.7
NZ   1057   121.5
SA    990   136.3
PAK   972   169.8
IND   962   146.4
ENG   961   131.7
WI    928   128.1
BAN   845   127.7

Just three sides above the 1000 level now that Pakistan has been dragged down. The gulf between the teams after they've played - still a full RD between - shows the value of England's win in Sri Lanka.

Twenty-20 rankings

IND  1102   122.3
PAK  1100   125.5
SL   1048   149.3
AUS  1034   133.7
SA   1026   129.2
NZ    965   132.6
WI    962   153.6
BAN   941   131.7
ENG   939   133

India's victory over Australia confirms their status as best in the world.

linkpage

older writing... write to